When Does Medical Software Qualify as a Medical Device? | MDR & IVDR Guide

REPHINE SPEECH MARKS OPEN MEDICALDEVICES

Understanding when software qualifies as a medical device is crucial to ensuring compliance with EU regulations — and ultimately, patient safety.

REPHINE SPEECH MARKS CLOSE MEDICALDEVICES

About this Guide

The rapid adoption of digital health solutions has brought software to the forefront of medical and healthcare applications. However, not all health-related software qualifies as a medical device. This guide explores when software is classified as Medical Device Software (MDSW) under Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR) and Regulation (EU) 2017/746 (IVDR). It breaks down classification frameworks, key guidelines, and risk-based classification rules to support medical software manufacturers in navigating compliance requirements.

 

Key Topics Covered

  • Overview of MDR and IVDR regulations
  • IMDRF guidance on Software as a Medical Device (SaMD)
  • Classification rules and risk categories
  • Practical examples of software qualification
  • Comparison with FDA software regulations

Unlock critical insights into medical software qualification and ensure your software meets EU regulatory standards, Download the guide now

 

Hero Image Medical Software as MD Guide MedTech

View our other resources and company news

QMS IMP Header image case study May 25 Article

Veterinary GMP in Europe: New Dedicated Framework & VICH GL60 Guide

The EU veterinary sector enters a new era on 16 July 2026. Dedicated GMP regulations replace EudraLex Volume 4 for veterinary products. Learn what changes ...
Read More
mock inspection blog header Case Study

Full GMP Internal Audit Program Executed On Time

A pharmaceutical manufacturer needed to complete their annual EU GMP internal audit cycle across 11 departments, without the internal capacity to do it. See how ...
Read More
Ensuring Compliance and Data Integrity in Pharmacovigilan QMS

From local to global: scaling your QMS for UK–EU operations

Learn how UK life sciences companies can scale their quality management system into EU markets without losing compliance, visibility, or operational control.
Read More
Ensuring Compliance and Data Integrity in Pharmacovigilan QMS

Scale Your Quality System from UK to EU Without Losing Control

Learn how UK life sciences companies can scale their quality management system into EU markets without losing compliance, visibility, or operational control.
Read More
SAP PALEX CSV Case Study Header Image (1500 x 844 px) Article

Pharmaceutical Equipment Qualification & Control System Validation

Qualifying process equipment and control systems is fundamental to GMP compliance. This guide breaks down how to define user requirements, apply risk-based testing, and maintain ...
Read More
mock inspection blog header Case Study

GMP Consultancy for a New Cannabis Manufacturing Plant

A start up cannabis manufacturer partnered with Rephine to design a GMP compliant facility, implement a practical Quality Management System and prepare for EU GMP ...
Read More
QMS IMP Header image case study May 25 Article

How an Internal Services Audit Can Maximise Your Regulatory Compliance

Internal services audits play a critical role in maintaining GMP compliance and driving continuous improvement. This article explores how structured gap assessments, internal audits and ...
Read More
GMP Raising the bar Blog series Header image May 25 Article

Effective QMS Management Post-Go-Live: Strategies for Governance, Releases, and Continuous Improvement

After QMS go live, compliance and performance depend on strong governance, structured release management and continuous improvement. Learn how to sustain control, adoption and long ...
Read More
Ensuring Compliance and Data Integrity in Pharmacovigilan Case Study

GMP Consultancy for a New Manufacturing Plant

With only a small team and a highly automated process, this biotech company needed to achieve EU GMP compliance fast. This case study shows how ...
Read More
Contact Us

Strengthen Your Assurance Journey

GMP Chapter 22 Adapting to Hybrid Documentation Standards